PDF To download article. 

DOI: 10.15507/1991-9468.030.202601.115-132

UDC 316.6

 

Development and Psychometric Characteristics of a Methodology for Diagnosing the Speed and Accuracy of Chess Decision-Making

Anna V. Aliokhina
Postgraduate Student, South Ural State University (76 Prospekt Lenina, Chelyabinsk 454080, Russian Federation), Psychologist, Personal Therapist, Supervisor, Full Member, Professional Psychotherapists League (3 Industrialnoe Shosse, Kerch 454091, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7963-7822, SPIN-code: 7131-1811, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Viktor G. Kolokoltsev
Chairman of the Tovarishch Chess Club, Chess Coach, “Fiolent” Factory (34, bld. 2 Kievskaya St., Simferopol 295017, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6122-4099, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Elena A. Rylskaya
Dr.Sci. (Psychol.), Professor, Head of the Chair of Management and Performance Psychology, South Ural State University (76 Prospekt Lenina, Chelyabinsk 454080, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3075-5255, Scopus ID: 57217988338, Researcher ID: AAC-1753-2020, SPIN-code: 7747-2213, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Gennadiy V. Manuilov
Cand.Sci. (Psychol.), Associate Professor of the Chair of Psychology of Management and Performance, South Ural State University (76 Prospekt Lenina, Chelyabinsk 454080, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9870-865X, Scopus ID: 57217994569, Researcher ID: MZR-0265-2025, SPIN-code: 7670-3190, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Asat G. Abdullin
Dr.Sci. (Psychol.), Professor, Senior Researcher of the Chair of Psychology of Management and Performance, South Ural State University (76 Prospekt Lenina, Chelyabinsk 454080, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0804-6148, Scopus ID: 57219331935, SPIN-code: 6300-8361, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Abstract
Introduction. The inclusion of chess in school education is substantiated by its proven positive impact on the cognitive development of the individual and by overcoming negative effects of digitalization. Key skills formed during the process of mastering chess include decision-making speed and accuracy. Howe ver, the current psychodiagnostic practice lacks tools capable of assessing these specific parameters. The aim of this study is the development and psychometric adaptation of a methodology designed to diagnose the speed and accuracy of chess decision-making. The proposed methodology allows for the comprehensive assessment of chess skills and the level of speed and accuracy in solving chess problems, in conjunction with J. Kagan’s test for determining the cognitive style of “impulsivity – reflectivity”, thereby providing a psychological profile of this style for a specific novice chess player.
Materials and Methods. In a pilot study, 30 chess problems were developed using Corel Draw for a relevant sample (59 novice chess players). The method of expert evaluation was applied. The final set of test items (12 chess problems) was corrected. The sample size was expanded to 280 respondents. J. Kagan’s psychodiagnostic method was used to determine the cognitive style of “impulsivity–reflectivity”. Statistical data processing methods were employed: Cronbach’s Alpha, Mann – Whitney U test, and Spearman’s correlation analysis.
Results. Following the expert evaluation, two levels of difficulty for the chess problems were established. The internal consistency for problems at the first and second levels was above 0.7 and 0.8, respectively, according to Cronbach’s Alpha. Sample homogeneity was determined using the Mann – Whitney U test. Convergent validity of the test items was demonstrated using J. Kagan’s methodology. Test-retest reliability and internal consistency of the methodology were confirmed by Spearman correlation coefficients. The developed methodology was established to have the capacity to identify the predominant cognitive style (impulsivity – reflectivity) in novice chess players.
Discussion and Conclusion. The obtained results will be useful for modern psychological practice and in emerging research areas: chess speech therapy for speech therapists and psychologists, the psychology of chess for chess coaches, other chess teachers, and psychological and pedagogical researchers studying the behavioral characteristics of beginning chess players. Timely diagnosis and correction of the “impulsivity – reflexivity” cognitive style is the basis for further improvement of individual performance indicators in chess players, helping them enjoy the game while maintaining a high motivation for self-improvement.

Keywords: novice chess players, speed and accuracy in decision making, “impulsivity – reflectivity” cognitive style, chess game, decision making strategy

Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

For citation: Aliokhina A.V., Kolokoltsev V.G., Rylskaya E.A., Manuilov G.V., Abdullin A.G. Development and Psychometric Characteristics of a Methodology for Diagnosing the Speed and Accuracy of Chess Decision-Making. Integration of Education. 2026;30(1):115–132. https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.030.202601.115-132

Authors’ contribution:
A. V. Aliokhina – application of formal techniques to analyse study data; conducting a research and investigation process; specifically writing the initial draft.
V. G. Kolokoltsev – designing computer programs; implementation of the computer code and supporting algorithms; specifically visualization; verification.
E. A. Rylskaya – formulation of research goals and aims; development of methodology; oversight and leadership responsibility for the research activity planning and execution.
G. V. Manuilov – designing computer programs; verification.
A. G. Abdullin – management and coordination responsibility for the research activity planning and execution; specifically critical review.

Availability of data and materials. The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the authors on reasonable request.

All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Submitted 04.06.2025;
revised 31.10.2025;
accepted 07.11.2025.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Dolgova V.I., Kryzhanovskaya N.V., Rataeva V.V. [The Influence of Memory on the Academic Performance of Younger Schoolchildren]. Scientific-Methodological Electronic Journal “Koncept”. (In Russ.) Available at: http://e-koncept.ru/2015/95526.htm (accessed 22.03.2025).
  2. Medushevskiy A.N. Cognitive Warfare: Social Control, Meaning-Making and the Instrument of the Global Dominance. Part 1. Voprosy teoreticheskoy ekonomiki. 2023;(2):85–98. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.52342/2587-7666VTE_2023_2_85_98
  3. Bagdasaryan V. Cognitive Matrices of Manipulation Technologies in Wars and Revolutions of a New Type. Bulletin of the Moscow Regional State University. Series: History and Political Sciences. 2020;(1):8–23. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-676X-2020-1-8-23
  4. Bart W.M. On the Effect of Chess Training on Scholastic Achievement. Frontiers in Psychology. 2014;5:762. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00762
  5. Chitiyo G., Zagumny L., Littrell M.N., Besnoy K., Akenson A.B., Davis K.M., et.al. Students’ Perceptions of the Benefits of Scholastic Chess Instruction. Brock Education Journal. 2021;31(1). https://doi.org/10.26522/brocked.v31i1.890
  6. Gevorkyan S.R., Ispiryan M.M., Sarkisyan V.Zh., Tadevosyan H.V. Research and Experience of Teaching the Subject “Chess” in the Educational System of the Republic of Armenia. Psychological Science and Education. 2023;28(6):121–135. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2023280612
  7. Glukhova O.V., Volikova S.V., Zaretskii Y.V., Zaretskii V.K. The Results of a Longitudinal Diagnostic Study on the Project “Chess for Overall Development”. Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy. 2022;30(4):49–75. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2022300404
  8. Sargsyan V.Zh., Manukyan S.A., Ispiryan M.M., Gevorgyan L.L., Khachatryan E.A. The Influence of Students’ Psychological Characteristics on the Results of Learning Chess. Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy. 2022;30(4):97–123. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2022300406
  9. Kholodnaya M. Cognitive Style as a Quadripolar Dimension. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2000;21(4):46–56. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) Available at: https://psy.jes.su/s0205-95920000621-0-1-ru-1703/ (accessed 22.03.2025).
  10. Volkova N.N., Gusev A.N. Cognitive Styles: Controversial Issues and Research Problems. National Psychological Journal. 2016;(2):28–37. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.11621/npj.2016.0203
  11. Kholodnaya M.A., Kostrikina I.S. Peculiarities of “Umpulsivity/Reflectivity” and “Rigidity/Flexibility of Cognitive Control” Styles in Subjects with High and Exceptionally High IQ Score. Psikhologicheskii jurnal. 2002;23(6):72–82. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://elibrary.ru/mpnazj
  12. Balandina L.L. Specifics of Expression of Cognitive Style “Impulsivenees – Reflectiveness» and Its Correlation with Intelligence and Personal Characteristics of Pre-Schoolers. Vestnik Permskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarno-pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Seriya No. 1. Psikhologicheskie i pedagogicheskie nauki. 2015;(1):55–65. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) Available at: https://vestnik1.pspu.ru/files/1-2015-1.pdf (accessed 22.03.2025).
  13. Broverman D.M. Dimensions of Cognitive Style. Journal of Personality. 1960;28(2):167–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1960.tb01611.x
  14. Ehrman M.E., Leaver B.L., Oxford R. A Brief Overview of Individual Differences in Second Language Learning. System. 2003;31(3):313–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(03)00045-9
  15. Budrina E.G. Interrelation between Parents’ and Children’s Cognitive Styles in Primary School and Early Adolescence. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology. 2021;11(4):356–370. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2021.405
  16. Grigoriev E.P., Galchenko A.S., Poskotinova L.V. Relationship of Parameters of the Impulsivity – Reflexivity Cognitive Style with Propensity to Internet Addiction in High School Students. Bulletin of Siberian Medicine. 2022;21(2):27–32. https://doi.org/10.20538/1682-0363-2022-2-27-32
  17. Volkova E.V., Dokuchaev D.A. Impulsivity – Reflexivity and Neuroefficiency of Intellectual Activity. Experimental Psychology (Russia). 2022;15(2):125–143. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2022150210
  18. Pavlovskaya V.A. Features of Cognitive Styles in the Chess Game. Scientific Notes of V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Sociology. Pedagogy. Psychology. 2020;6(3):115–126. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.37279/2413-1709-2020-6-3-115-126
  19. Gorelik V.V., Filippova S.N., Knysheva T.P. Physiological Indicators of Schoolchildren of 7–12 Years of Age Peculiar to Mental Arithmetic Sessions Combined with Attention Switching Physical Exercises. Bulletin of Russian State Medical University. 2018;(5):53–61. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.24075/vrgmu.2018.057
  20. Kholodnaya M.A. On the Splitting Effect of Cognitive Style Poles: Twenty Years Later. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology. 2025;15(1):35–50. Available at: https://psyjournals.ru/journals/vspu_psychology/archive/2025_n1/Kholodnaya (accessed 22.03.2025).

 

 

PlumX

Лицензия Creative Commons
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.