You are here: Home Аrchive of articles 2025 №1 List of Article 07. Ushkin S. G., Koval E. A., Martynova M. D. Teenagers’ Digital Security: Sociological Analysis (In Russ.)

PDF To download article. 

DOI: 10.15507/1991-9468.029.202501.114-131

UDC 004.9-027.45:303-053.6

 

Teenagers’ Digital Security: Sociological Analysis

Sergey G. Ushkin
Cand.Sci. (Sociol.), Leading Researcher, Scientific Center for Socio-Economic Monitoring (39a B. Khmelnitskogo St., Saransk 430005, Russian Federation), Research Manager, Russian Public Opinion Research Center (38 Prechistenka St., Moscow 119034, Russian Federation), Researcher, National Research Mordovia State University (68 Bolshevistskaya St., Saransk 430005, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4317-6615, Scopus ID: 55489629800, Researcher ID: E-7455-2017, SPIN-code: 1894-6660, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Ekaterina A. Koval
Dr.Sci. (Philos.), Professor, Chair of Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure, Middle Volga Branch, All-Russian State University of Justice (6 Fedoseenko St., Saransk 430003, Russian Federation), Professor, Chair of General History, Political Science and Area Studies, National Research Mordovia State University (68 Bolshevistskaya St., Saransk 430005, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0069-5335, Scopus ID: 57202425856, Researcher ID: A-5797-2015, SPIN-code: 7939-4818, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Marina D. Martynova
Cand.Sci. (Philos.), Associate Professor, National Research Mordovia State University (68 Bolshevistskaya St., Saransk 430005, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1244-9721, Scopus ID: 57225145640, Researcher ID: HKN-1837-2023, SPIN-code: 1287-0833, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Abstract
Introduction. The growing amount of personal data posted by users about themselves and other people on social media platforms, the intensification of user-generated content collection for machine learning determines the relevance of the research. The impact of new digital tools on users’ online safety strategies needs to be scrutinized. The focus of the work is on adolescents, who represent one of the most risky groups. The aim of the study is to determine teenagers’ perceptions of concerns related to their personal data and to compare them in two different Russian regions.
Materials and Methods. The empirical base is represented by the data of a sociological study conducted in 2023–2024 by online survey among schoolchildren of grades 8–11 in two Russian regions – the Republic of Mordovia and the Donetsk People’s Republic. The sample is quota-based, representing each of the regions separately.
Results. Nearly half of respondents have some concerns about the collection of personal data. Most of them have negative attitudes towards their data and content being exposed to large datasets and used for machine learning. Teenagers fear that their data will be used for criminal purposes as well as financial loss. They believe that the surest way to ensure digital security is not to share their personal data unless it is necessary.
Discussion and Conclusion. The materials of the article can be used to develop educational programs and practical recommendations aimed at improving digital literacy and formation of conscious practices of personal data protection among teenagers. This is especially important in the current conditions of hybrid warfare and the spread of fraudulent activities in virtual space.

Keywords: school students’ digital safety, digital risks, personal data protection, big data, privacy paradox, privacy illusion, large language models

Funding: The article was prepared with the financial support of the Russian Science Foundation, project No. 2328-01288 (https://rscf.ru/project/23-28-01288/).

Acknowledgments: The authors express their gratitude to the reviewers for their reasoned comments and recommendations for review of the article; to the students of National Research Mordovia State University Astashova E., Vdovina A., Kastolina A., Kvashenkova E., Lysenkova V., Samosudov E. for organizing the field stage of the research in the Republic of Mordovia, to the student of Donetsk State University Zanin E. – in the Donetsk People’s Republic.

Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

For citation: Ushkin S.G., Koval E.A., Martynova M.D. Teenagers’ Digital Security: Sociological Analysis. Integration of Education. 2025;29(1):114–131. https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.029.202501.114-131

Author’s contribution:
S. G. Ushkin – development of the research concept; visualization, analysis and interpretation of research results; preparation of the initial version of the manuscript.
E. A. Koval – development of sociological research tools; data collection; revision of the manuscript.
M. D. Martynova – organization of sociological research; data collection; revision of the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials. The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the authors on reasonable request.

All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Submitted 30.07.2024;
revised 04.10.2024;
accepted 11.10.2024.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Gourkina O.A., Maltseva D.V. [Adolescents’ Motivations to Use Virtual Social Networking Sites]. Sociological Studies. 2015;(5):123–130. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.socis.isras.ru/article/5226 (accessed 19.06.2024).
  2. Barnes S.B. APrivacy Paradox: Social Networking in the United States. First Monday. 2006;11(9):1394. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v11i9.1394
  3. Youn S. Parental Influence and Teens’ Attitude toward Online Privacy Protection. Journal of Consumer Affairs. 2008;42(3):362–388. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2008.00113.x
  4. Maltseva N.N., Novak M.V. Media Literacy, Security and Socialization of the Individual in the Digital Space: Overview Analytics. Research Result. Social Studies and Humanities. 2023;9(1):207–212. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) Available at: https://rrhumanities.ru/journal/article/3027/ (accessed 14.07.2024).
  5. Tomczyk Ł., Eger L. Online Safety as a New Component of Digital Literacy for Young People. Integration of Education. 2020;24(2):172–184. https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.099.024.202002.172-184
  6. Filippov V.M., Nasonkin V.V., Papacharalambous C. Rights and Interests of Children in the Information Sphere: Improvement of Legislation. Vestnik of Saint-Petersburg University. Law. 2019;10(2):362–372. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2019.211
  7. Young S. Zoombombing Your Toddler: User Experience and the Communication of Zoom’s Privacy Crisis. Journal of Business and Technical Communication. 2020;35(1):147–153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1050651920959201
  8. Semantha F.H., Azam S., Shanmugam B., Yeo K.C. PbDinEHR: A Novel Privacy by Design Developed Framework Using Distributed Data Storage and Sharing for Secure and Scalable Electronic Health Records Management. Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks. 2023;12(2):36. https://doi.org/10.3390/jsan12020036
  9. Ushkin S.G. Practices of Collecting Personal Data and Their Perception in the Public Consciousness. Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2024;(77):251–261. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) Available at: https://vital.lib.tsu.ru/vital/access/manager/Repository/koha:001145764?y=0&x=0 (accessed 14.07.2024).
  10. Soldatova G.U., Teslavskaya O.I. Personal Data and Children: Issues of Safety. Epokha nauki. 2017;(12):92–102. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) Available at: http://eraofscience.com/EofS/Vypyski2017/December2017g/12-dekabr_2017_g..pdf#page=93 (accessed 14.07.2024).
  11. Hoffmann A.L. Where Fairness Fails: Data, Algorithms, and the Limits of Antidiscrimination Discourse. Information, Communication and Society. 2019;22(7):900–915. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1573912
  12. Mukhamadieva K.B. Artificial Intelligence in the Development of Youth. Education and Problems of Development of Society. 2021;(2):27–33. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) EDN: DDJAGW
  13. Medvedeva M.V. Risks of Using Neural Network Technologies in Youth Communications. Russian School of Public Relations. 2023;(30):139–151. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.24412/2949-2513-2023-30-139-151
  14. Hummel P., Braun M., Dabrock P. Own Data? Ethical Reflections on Data Ownership. Philosophy and Technology. 2021;34:545–572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-020-00404-9
  15. Marinova E.V. Terms Creation in the Russian-Language Discourse on “Digit”. Terra Linguistica. 2023;14(3):61–79. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.18721/JHSS.14306
  16. Begishev I. Semantic Analysis of the Term “Digital Security”. Legal Linguistics. 2021;(20):24–38. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.14258/leglin(2021)2005
  17. Boronenko T.A., Kaysina A.V., Fedotova V.S. The Development of Digital Literacy of Schoolchildren in Conditions of Creating a Digital Educational Environment. Perspectives of Science and Education. 2019;(2):167–193. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2019.2.14
  18. Pinkevich T.V., Nesterenko A.V. Violation of Privacy When Using Big Data Technologies. Legal Science and Practice: Journal of the Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2019;2019(3):143–147. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.36511/2078-5356-2019-3-143-147
  19. Ovchinnikov A.I., Akhrameeva O.V., Vorontsov S.A., Kozhokar I.P., Kravchenko A.G., Mamychev A.Yu., et al. Digital Security of the Individual, Society and the State in the Context of Globalization: Legal Mechanisms to Ensure. Overview of the Session within the Legal Forum Live Project of the St. Petersburg International Legal Forum 2019. Bulletin of the Law Faculty, Southern Federal University. 2019;6(2):111–122. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) Available at: https://urvestnikpravo.sfedu.ru/index.php/Vestnikurfaksfedu/issue/view/6 (accessed 14.07.2024).
  20. Selyunina S.V., Gorbachevа N.A. Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Ensuring Information Security of Children and Teenagers in Global Network. Public Health and Life Environment. 2017;(8):11–17. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) EDN: ZEVTPP
  21. Chang V., Golightly L., Xu Q.A., Boonmee T., Liu B.S. Cybersecurity for Children: An Investigation into the Application of Social Media. Enterprise Information Systems. 2023;17(11):2188122. https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2023.2188122
  22. Samokhina N.N. Personal Security in the Internet Space: Establishing and Protecting New Boundaries of Privacy. Economic and Social Research. 2023;(1):148–154. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) Available at: https://esgi-miet.ru/images/Stati20231/ESGI_2023_1-37_1.indd.pdf (accessed 14.07.2024).
  23. Chesnokova L.V. Blurring the Line between Publicity and Privacy on Social Media and the Privacy Paradox. Philosophical Problems of IT and Cyberspace. 2021;(2):22–38. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.17726/philIT.2021.2.2
  24. Holvoet S., De Jans S., De Wolf R., Hudders L., Herrewijn L. Exploring Teenagers’ Folk Theories and Coping Strategies Regarding Commercial Data Collection and Personalized Advertising. Media and Communication. 2022;10(1):317–328. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i1.4704
  25. Barth S., de Jong M.D.T. The Privacy Paradox – Investigating Discrepancies between Expressed Privacy Concerns and Actual Online Behavior – A Systematic Literature Review. Telematics and Informatics. 2017;34(7):1038–1058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.04.013
  26. Park Y.J. Digital Literacy and Privacy Behavior Online. Communication Research. 2013;40(2):215–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211418338
  27. Wisniewski P. The Privacy Paradox of Adolescent Online Safety: A Matter of Risk Prevention or Risk Resilience? IEEE Security and Privacy. 2018;16(2):86–90. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2018.1870874
  28. Rudenkin D. The Level of Development of Digital Hygiene Skills of Modern Russian Youth: The Results Sociological Research. Sociodynamics. 2022;(1):36–55. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-7144.2022.1.37487
  29. Maier E., Doerk M., Reimer U., Baldauf M. Digital Natives Aren’t Concerned Much about Privacy, or Are They? i-com. 2023;22(1):83–98. https://doi.org/10.1515/icom-2022-0041
  30. Vespoli G., Taddei B., Imbimbo E., De Luca L., Nocentini A. The Concept of Privacy in the Digital World According to Teenagers. Journal of Public Health. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-024-02242-x
  31. Kostina S.N., Novikova O.N. Impact of Digital Technologies on Learning Activities of Adolescents. Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2023;(74):190–205. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) EDN: JGXWML
  32. Regush L.A., Alexeyeva E.V., Veretina O.R., Orlova A.V., Pezhemskaya Yu.S. Internet-Related Psychological Issues in Adolescents: Diagnosis and Coping Strategies. Russian Foundation for Basic Research Journal. Humanities and Social Sciences. 2023;(3):72–85. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) Available at: https://www.rfbr.ru/storage/library/vestnik/pdf/60ec69f0960d62e139cea159f61fdc2c.pdf (accessed 14.07.2024).
  33. Karkishchenko E.A. [Personal Questionnaire Data as Representation of a Teenager’s Gender Identity]. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 9. Philology. 2013;(3):160–167. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) Available at: https://vestnik.philol.msu.ru/issues/VMU_9_Philol__2013_3.pdf (accessed 25.02.2024).
  34. Borisenko E.V., Dozortseva E.G. Motivation and Subjective Meaning of Participation in Sexting in Minor Girls. Psychology and Law. 2023;13(3):3–15. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2023130301
  35. Glukhov A.P., Solomina I.G. Factors of Cybersocialization and Digital Literacy of Students. Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2024;(78):146–156. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) EDN: ETWKAM
  36. De Leyn T., Waeterloos C., De Wolf R., Vanhaelewyn B., Ponnet K., De Marez L. Teenagers’ Reflections on Media Literacy Initiatives at School and Everyday Media Literacy Discourses. Journal of Children and Media. 2021;16(2):221–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2021.1952463
  37. Whelan E., Lang M., Butler M. Beyond Lazy; External Locus of Control as an Alternative Explanation for the Privacy Paradox. Internet Research. 2024;35(1):349–379. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR04-2023-0282

 

PlumX

Лицензия Creative Commons
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Details
Hits: 55