You are here: Home Аrchive of articles 2026 №1 List of Article 09. Tikhonova E. V., Grigorieva M. A. From Data to Discourse: Interpretive Shifts in the Use of Visualizations in Educational Research Articles

PDF To download article. 

DOI: 10.15507/1991-9468.030.202601.182-203

UDC 80:004.422.86

 

From Data to Discourse: Interpretive Shifts in the Use of Visualizations in Educational Research Articles

Elena V. Tikhonova
Cand.Sci. (History), Associate Professor, Associate Professor, MGIMO University (76 Prospekt Vernadskogo, Moscow 119454, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8252-6150, Scopus ID: 57208387246, Researcher ID: B-1951-2015, SPIN-code: 6460-4083, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Maria A. Grigorieva
Cand.Sci. (Philol.), Associate Professor of the Chair of Russian and Foreign Languages, Sergo Ordzhonikidze Russian State University for Geological Prospecting (23 Mikloukho-Maklai St., Moscow 117997, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6813-1694, Researcher ID: LEM-2889-2024, SPIN-code: 9630-6420, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Abstract
Introduction. Visual elements, including tables, figures, and diagrams, are a routine feature of contemporary research articles. Previous scholarship has described their formal properties and has documented the prevalence of descriptive commentary, yet the cross sectional dynamics of visual meaning within the IMRaD structure remain insufficiently specified. In particular, it is still unclear how the rhetorical and epistemic status of the same visual changes when it is taken up in Discussion after initial presentation in Results. The aim of the study is to conduct a discursive-rhetorical and epistemological analysis of the functions of data visualization in the structural components of original research articles.
Materials and Methods. The study examined a purpose-built corpus of 50 peer reviewed education research articles published between 2018 and 2024. All verbal references to visual elements were manually coded using an analytic scheme covering integration type, interpretation depth index, and interpretative function. The coding also captured causal relation patterns, argumentative frames, interpretative shifts between Results and Discussion, and recurrent phrase frames. Coding reliability was assessed through double coding of a subset of the corpus and calculation of intercoder agreement. Quantitative analysis combined descriptive statistics with chi square tests of association.
Results. The corpus contained 576 unique visual elements and 551 verbal references. Visuals were concentrated in Results and Methods. Referential and descriptive integration predominated, whereas interpretative integration was uncommon. Interpretation depth was heavily weighted toward the lowest levels, and higher order interpretation and theoretical generalization accounted for a small minority of cases. Argumentative framing was dominated by Support, and interpretative shifts between Results and Discussion were rare, occurring in 2.4 percent of references. Phrase frame analysis likewise showed a strong reliance on referential and descriptive formulae.
Discussion and Conclusion. In education research articles, visuals function primarily as instruments of data presentation rather than as resources for interpretation and theorization. The scarcity of interpretative shifts suggests a structural constraint on the extent to which visuals are recontextualized as argumentative evidence across sections of the article. Although visuals are ubiquitous, their epistemic potential is activated only intermittently. These findings motivate more explicit pedagogical attention to visual literacy in research writing and invite editorial reflection on how multimodal evidence is expected to contribute to knowledge claims within the IMRaD genre.

Keywords: visual elements, multimodal discourse, education research articles, visual integration, interpretation depth, argumentative frames, interpretative shifts, phrase frames

Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

For citation: Tikhonova E.V., Grigorieva M.A. From Data to Discourse: Interpretive Shifts in the Use of Visualizations in Educational Research Articles. Integration of Education. 2026;30(1):182–203. https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.030.202601.182-203

Authors’ contribution:
E. V. Tikhonova – conceptualization; development of methodology; oversight and leadership responsibility for the research activity planning and execution; management activities to produce metadata for initial use and later re-use; conducting a research and investigation process; specifically visualization; application of formal techniques to analyze study data; provision of study materials; specifically writing the initial draft and revising the manuscript.
M. A. Grigorieva – management activities to produce metadata for initial use and later re-use; conducting a research and investigation process; application of formal techniques to analyze study data; specifically writing the initial draft.

Availability of data and materials. The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the authors on reasonable request.

All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Submitted 09.12.2025;
revised 09.02.2026;
accepted 16.02.2026.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Miller T. Visual Persuasion: A Comparison of Visuals in Academic Texts and the Popular Press. English for Specific Purposes. 1998;17(1):29–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00029-X
  2. Hyland K. English for Academic Purposes: An Advanced Resource Book. London: Routledge; 2006.
  3. Gross A.G., Harmon J.E. Science from Sight to Insight: How Scientists Illustrate Meaning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2014.
  4. Moghaddasi S., Graves H.A.B., Graves R., Gutierrez X. “See Figure 1”: Visual Moves in Discrete Mathematics Research Articles. English for Specific Purposes. 2019;56:50–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2019.08.001
  5. Ma Y., Jiang F. Verbal and Visual Resources in Graphical Abstracts: Analyzing Patterns of Knowledge Presentation in Digital Genres. Ibérica. 2023;(46):129–154. https://doi.org/10.17398/2340-2784.46.129
  6. Ibrahim A., Lillemoe K., Klingensmith M., Dimick J. Visual Abstracts to Disseminate Research on Social Media: A Prospective, Case–Control Crossover Study. Annals of Surgery. 2020;266(6):e46–e48. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002277
  7. Wu J., Zhao C.G., Lu X., Jin T. A Rhetorical Function and Phraseological Analysis of Commentaries on Visuals. English for Specific Purposes. 2024;73:33–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2023.09.001
  8. Zhang Y., Zhang L. Tracking the Changing Patterns of Graphic Data Commentary in Economics Research Articles over Time: A Local Grammar Study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2024;72:101437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101437
  9. Ren J., Xu J. Ideational Interplay of Textual and Visual Elements in Graphical Abstracts of Biology Research Articles. English for Specific Purposes. 2025;78:156–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2025.01.002
  10. Ariga K., Tashiro M. Change in the Graphics of Journal Articles in the Life Sciences Field: Analysis of Figures and Tables in the Journal “Cell”. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences. 2022;44:33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-022-00516-9
  11. Swales J.M., Feak C.B. Academic Writing for Graduate Students: Essential Tasks and Skills. University of Michigan Press; 2012.
  12. Pérez-Llantada C. Genres and Languages in Science Communication: The Multiple Dimensions of the Science-Policy Interface. Language and Communication. 2021;78:65–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2021.02.004
  13. Tikhonova E.V., Mezentseva D.A. Integrating Visualisation Tools into the Text of an Original Research Manuscript: Lexical Bundles and Textual Comments. Integration of Education. 2025;29(2):316–338. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.029.202502.316-338
  14. Halliday M.A.K., Hasan R. Cohesion in English. London: Longman; 1976.
  15. Myers, G. Writing Biology: Tetxs in the Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge. Journal of the History of Biology. 1991;24(3):521–527.
  16. Kress G., Van Leeuwen T. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge; 2020. 310 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003099857
  17. Hyland K. Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London, New York: Continuum; 2005.
  18. Hyland K. Academic Discourse: English in a Global Context. London: Continuum; 2009.
  19. Toulmin S. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003.
  20. Swales J.M. Research Genres: Explorations and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524827
  21. Macagno F., Walton D., Reed C. Argumentation Schemes. History, Classifications, and Computational Applications. Journal of Logics and their Applications. 2017;4(8):2493–2556. Available at: https://clck.ru/3RnNp5 (accessed 01.11.2025).
  22. Cortes V. The Purpose of This Study is to: Connecting Lexical Bundles and Moves in Research Article Introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2013;12(1):33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2012.11.002
  23. Wang Y. When Methods and Results Intertwine: An Exploration from Congruent and Metaphorical Construal. English for Specific Purposes. 2025;78:109–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2024.12.001
  24. Du Z., Jiang F., Liu L. Profiling Figure Legends in Scientific Research Articles: A Corpus-Driven Approach. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2021;54:101054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.101054
  25. Du Y., Wang J., The Unveiling Diachronic Changes in Interactive Metadiscourse Use in the Academic Writing of Applied Linguistics over 45 Years. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2026;79:101601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101601
  26. Swales J. Other Floors, Other Voices: a Textography of a Small University Building. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associated; 1998.
  27. van Hulst M., Holstead K., Metze T. Conceptualizing Transdisciplinarity: How do Visuals Mean? Environmental Science and Policy. 2026;176:104253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104253
  28. Zhang X., Ji X., Cao P., Xiao Q. Storytelling through Images: Understanding the Persuasive Effectiveness of Social Media Influencers’ Visual Narratives. Journal of Business Research. 2026;207:116003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2026.116003
  29. Liu L., Jiang F.K., Du Zh. Figure Legends of Scientific Research Articles: Rhetorical Moves and Phrase Frames. English for Specific Purposes. 2023;70:86–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2022.11.005
  30. Zhang L., Jiang R., Zhang J. ‘Table 1 Shows that…’: A Local Grammar of Graphic Data Commentary in Discourse of Economics. English for Specific Purposes. 2024;74:68–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2024.01.001

 

 

PlumX

Лицензия Creative Commons
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Details
Hits: 58