PDF To download article. 

DOI: 10.15507/1991-9468.029.202502.422-444

UDC 378.1

 

Integrating Skills and Education to Boost Individual Productivity

Ilya A. Korshunov
Cand.Sci. (Chem.), Chief Researcher, Deputy Director of Lifelong Learning Laboratory, Institute of Education, HSE University (11 Pokrovskii Bulvar, Moscow 101000, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0706-0308, Scopus ID: 57201132401, Researcher ID: Q-8721-2018, SPIN-code: 5543-7218, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Anna G. Eregina
Cand.Sci. (Sociol.), Researcher of Lifelong Learning Laboratory, Institute of Education, HSE University (11 Pokrovskii Bulvar, Moscow 101000, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4630-8453, Researcher ID: JMQ-4089-2023, SPIN-code: 7714-7570, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Ivan A. Andronov
Graduate Student, HSE University (11 Pokrovskii Bulvar, Moscow 101000, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4924-1182, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Abstract
Introduction. Despite access to modern technologies, the issue of labor productivity in the Russian Federation remains unresolved to its full extent. Consequently, identifying skill sets as outcomes of scientific and pedagogical activities, for which training is prioritized to increase the productivity of existing and newly created jobs, becomes increasingly relevant. The aim of this research is to identify a set of skills, the development of which impacts individual productive labor activity, as well as to identify high-performance managerial practices in the workplace that enable a significant improvement in an employee’s individual productivity.
Materials and Methods. The article is founded on foreign and domestic data from theoretical and empirical studies of skills for productivity increasing.
Results. The authors have identified four areas of the most relevant skills for increasing individual productivity: skills for a high-tech workplace; skills in managing socio-emotional and psychological condition; skills in managing of social environment for creating of a high-performance work system; entrepreneurial skills (agency) for the formation of a new field of strategic action.
Discussion and Conclusion. Skills’ development should include the training of all skills’ groups: cognitive, hard, soft, “green”, entrepreneurial. Special attention should be paid to the productive socio-emotional condition regulation, that depends both on the internal individual causes and on the creators’ skills of the of the social fields of strategic action.

Keywords: productivity, education, hard and soft skills, organization management, strategic action

Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

For citation: Korshunov I.A., Eregina A.G., Andronov I.A. Integrating Skills and Education to Boost Individual Productivity. Integration of Education. 2025;29(3):422–444. https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.029.202503.422-444

Authors’ contribution:
I. A. Korshunov – oversight and leadership responsibility for the research activity planning and execution; formulation of research goals and aims; specifically critical review.
A. G. Eregina – conducting a research and investigation process; specifically writing the initial draft; specifically critical review.
I. A. Andronov – conducting a research and investigation process; specifically writing the initial draft.

Availability of data and materials. The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the authors on reasonable request.

All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Submitted 30.01.2025;
revised 29.04.2025;
accepted 06.05.2025.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Shrotryia V.K., Singh S.V.P. Measuring Progress beyond GDP: A Theoretical Perspective. Emerging Economy Studies. 2021;6(2):143–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/2394901520983784
  2. Korshunov I.A., Shirkova N.N., Miroshnikov M.S. Export of Continuing Education Programs: Skills and Technology (Case Study of Agricultural Universities). Integration of Education. 2019;23(4):518–540. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.097.023.201904.518-540
  3. Eggenberger C., Janssen S., Backes-Gellner U. The Value of Specific Skills under Shock: High Risks and High Returns. Labour Economics. 2022;78:102187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2022.102187
  4. Chatterjee S., Chaudhuri R., Vrontis D., Giovando G. Digital Workplace and Organization Performance: Moderating Role of Digital Leadership Capability. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. 2023;8(1):100334. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2023.100334
  5. Ryazantseva M.V. Developing Digital Competences as a Labour Productivity Growth Source. Economics, Taxes & Law. 2019;12(6):77–85. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://elibrary.ru/esuyhb
  6. Korshunov I., Lubnikov S., Miroshnikov M., Tyunin A. Problem Solving and Formal, Nonformal, and Informal Learning of Russian Employees (Based on PIAAC Data). Adult Education Quarterly. 2023;73(2):197–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/07417136221113577
  7. Korshunov I.A., Lubnikov S.V., Shirkova N.N. Adult Education and Training for the Development of Problem-Solving Skills. The Education and Science Journal. 2023;25(6):166–192. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2023-6-166-192
  8. Barrera-Osorio F., Kugler A., Silliman M. Hard and Soft Skills in Vocational Training: Experimental Evidence from Colombia. The World Bank Economic Review. 2023;37(3):409–436. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhad007
  9. Vittadini G., Sturaro C., Folloni G. Non-Cognitive Skills and Cognitive Skills to Measure School Efficiency. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences. 2022;81:101058. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2021.101058
  10. Rozhkova K.V., Roshchin S.Yu. The Impact of Non-Cognitive Characteristics on the Higher Education Choice-Making: An Economist Perspective. Educational Studies Moscow. 2021;(3):138–167. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2021-3-138-167
  11. Borghans L., Ter Weel B., Weinberg B.A. Interpersonal Styles and Labor Market Outcomes. Journal of Human Resources. 2008;43(4):815–858. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhr.2008.0029
  12. Conti G., Galeotti A., Müller G., Pudney S. Popularity. Journal of Human Resources. 2013;48(4):1072–1094. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.48.4.1072
  13. Kuhn P., Weinberger C. Leadership Skills and Wages. Journal of Labor Economics. 2005;23(3):395–436. https://doi.org/10.1086/430282
  14. Rozhkova K.V. The Return to Noncognitive Characteristics in the Russian Labor Market. Voprosy ekonomiki. 2019;(11):81–107. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2019-11-81-107
  15. Peifer C., Wolters G., Harmat L., Heutte J., Tan J., Freire T., et al. A Scoping Review of Flow Research. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022;13:815665. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.815665
  16. Tse D., Nakamura J., Csikszentmihalyi M. Flow Experiences across Adulthood: Preliminary Findings on the Continuity Hypothesis. Journal of Happiness Studies. 2022;23(3):2517–2540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-022-00514-5
  17. Kotler S., Mannino M., Kelso S., Huskey R. First Few Seconds for Flow: A Comprehensive Proposal of the Neurobiology and Neurodynamics of State Onset. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. 2022;143:104956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104956
  18. Kobayashi K., Hsu M. Common Neural Code for Reward and Information Value. Psychological and Cognitive Sciences. 2019;116(26):13061–13066. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1820145116
  19. Naseer S., Chughtai M.S., Syed F. Do High-Performance Work Practices Promote an Individual’s Readiness and Commitment to Change? The Moderating Role of Adaptive Leadership. Journal of Organizational Change Management. 2023;36(6):899–916. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-02-2023-0036
  20. Tawk C.J. Effects of High-Performance Work Practices (HPWPs) on Employee Performance: A Review Article. Journal of Human Resource and Sustainability Studies. 2021;9(3):397–412. https://doi.org/10.4236/jhrss.2021.93025
  21. Cerasoli C.P., Alliger G.M., Donsbach J.S., Mathieu J.E., Tannenbaum S.I., Orvis K.A. Antecedents and Outcomes of Informal Learning Behaviors: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology. 2018;33:203–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-017-9492-y
  22. Obeng A.F., Zhu Y., Quansah P.E., Ntarmah A.H., Cobbinah E. High-Performance Work Practices and Turnover Intention: Investigating the Mediating Role of Employee Morale and the Moderating Role of Psychological Capital. SAGE Open. 2021;11(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020988557
  23. Hauff S., Felfe J., Klug K. High-Performance Work Practices, Employee Well-Being, and Supportive Leadership: Spillover Mechanisms and Boundary Conditions between HRM and Leadership Behavior. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 2022;33(10):2109–2137. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2020.1841819
  24. Saks A. Caring Human Resources Management and Employee Engagement. Human Resource Management Review. 2021;32(3):100835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100835
  25. Stanford V., Barna S., Gupta D., Mortimer F. Teaching Skills for Sustainable Health Care. The Lancet Planetary Health. 2023;7(1);e64–e67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00330-8
  26. Škare M., Blanco-Gonzalez-Tejero C., Crecente F., del Val M.T. Scientometric Analysis on Entrepreneurial Skills-Creativity, Communication, Leadership: How Strong is the Association? Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2022;182:121851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121851
  27. Sorokin P.S., Froumin I.D. Education as a Source for Transformative Agency: Theoretical and Practical Issues. Educational Studies Moscow. 2022;(1):116–137. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2022-1-116-137
  28. Van den Hout J.J., Davis O.C. Promoting the Emergence of Team Flow in Organizations. International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology. 2021;7:143–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41042-021-00059-7
  29. Skalli D., Charkaoui A., Cherrafi A., Shokri A., Garza-Reyes J.A., Antony J. Analysis of Factors Influencing Circular-Lean-Six Sigma 4.0 Implementation Considering Sustainability Implications: An Exploratory Study. International Journal of Production Research. 2024;62(11):3890–3917. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2023.2251159
  30. Shi L., Van Veldhoven M., Kooij D., Van De Voorde K., Karanika-Murray M. High-Performance Work Systems and Individual Performance: A Longitudinal Study of the Differential Roles of Happiness and Health Well-Being. Frontiers in Psychology. 2024;14:1261564. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1261564
  31. Ksenofontova E.G. “High Performance Work System”: Challenges and Good Practices of Organizations around the World. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science. 2023;29(4):125–148. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2023-29-4-125-148

 

PlumX

Лицензия Creative Commons
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.