To download article.UDK 377.031
DOI: 10.15507/1991-9468.102.025.202101.069-090
Assessing the Learning Administration of Higher Education Institutions by Graduates’ Turn-Out and Learning Outcomes: Theory and Practice
Aleksandr I. Bokarev
Associate Professor of the Chair of Industrial Ecology and Safety, Omsk State Technical University (11 Mira Prospect, Omsk 644050, Russian Federation), Cand.Sci. (Eng.), Associate Professor, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4712-8629, Scopus ID: 57205220710, Researcher ID: F-3763-2018, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Еlena S. Denisova
Associate Professor of the Chair of Industrial Ecology and Safety, Omsk State Technical University (11 Mira Prospect, Omsk 644050, Russian Federation), Cand.Sci. (Biol.), Associate Professor, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0136-858X, Scopus ID: 57205224695, Researcher ID: F-3024-2018, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Ivan A. Ignatovich
Associate Professor of the Chair of Industrial Ecology and Safety, Omsk State Technical University (11 Mira Prospect, Omsk 644050, Russian Federation), Cand.Sci. (Eng.), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4696-0950, Researcher ID:F-6237-2019, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Aleksandr Yu. Kazakov
Senior Lecturer of the Chair of Mechanical Science, Omsk State Technical University (11 Mira Prospect, Omsk 644050, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9971-7850, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Introduction. This article describes how universities are fulfilling their training assignments. Its relevance is determined by the growing need of teachers to correlate the learning results of specialists-to-be with learning assignments. The aim of the article is to describe a method for assessing the learning management system of higher education institutions by analysing learning outcomes and graduates’ turn-out.
Materials and Methods. The study relies on the collection and analysis of the results of specialists’ training between 2015 and 2019. The joint use of the obtained data and methods of normative forecasting and interpolation allowed the authors to calculate and measure the intermediate results relative to the final ones, to build educational trajectories, which made it possible to evaluate the learning management system by dealing with training results and graduates turn-out.
Results. For the first time the authors of the article showed that the measured results demonstrated not only the scope of specialists’ training and graduation, but they evaluated management of the educational process and developed necessary management decisions to regulate standards and measures for specialists’ training and graduation according to the specified final results.
Discussion and Conclusion. The conclusions contribute to the development of the concept of learning management systems, provided that there are specified final results of the specialists’ graduation. Findings are of interest to the scientific and pedagogical community, professors, teaching staff and leadership of educational institutions.
Keywords: educational process, the task of training specialists, educational path, a given rate of graduates’ turnout, optimal and rational areas of management
Funding: The article is written following the results of the research in the field of education quality management.
Acknowledgments: The authors are thankful to the anonymous reviewer for his valuable remakes.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
For citation: Bokarev A.I., Denisova Е.S., Ignatovich I.A., Kazakov A.Yu. Assessing the Learning Administration of Higher Education Institutions by Graduates’ Turn-Out and Learning Outcomes: Theory and Practice. Integratsiya obrazovaniya = Integration of Education. 2021; 25(1):69-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.102.025.202101.069-090
Contribution of the authors:
A. I. Bokarev – scientific management of research; setting the scientific problem; development of research methods; analysis and synthesis of research results; writing the abstract and the text of the article.
Е. S. Denisova – literature review on the problem of research; collection and primary systematization of research results; construction of tables and figures.
I. A. Ignatovich – participation in the discussion of article materials; preparation and formulation of conclusions on the results of the study.
A. Yu. Kazakov – participation in the discussion of the article; writing the draft.
All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Submitted 13.09.2020; approved after reviewing 26.01.2021;
accepted for publication 01.02.2021.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
