06 Tikhonova E. V., Kosycheva M. A., Mezentseva D. A. Ineffective Strategies in Scientific Communication: Textual Wordiness vs. Clarity of Thought in Thesis Conclusion Section

LATEST ISSUE

For readers

For authors

For reviewers

SOCIAL NETWORKS

Integration of Education is an open access journal, which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.

All the materials of the “Integration of Education” journal are made available under a Creative Commons “Attribution” 4.0 license.

Useful Materials

To download article.

DOI: 10.15507/1991-9468.115.028.202402.249-265

Ineffective Strategies in Scientific Communication: Textual Wordiness vs. Clarity of Thought in Thesis Conclusion Section

Elena V. Tikhonova
Cand.Sci. (History), Associate Professor, Associate Professor, MGIMO University (76 Vernadsky Avenue, Moscow 119454, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8252-6150, Scopus ID: 57208387246, Researcher ID: B-1951-2015, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Marina A. Kosycheva
Cand.Sci. (Philol.), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the School of Foreign Languages, HSE University (20 Myasnitskaya St., Moscow 101000, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0328-3109, Scopus ID: 57219614422, Researcher ID: ABB-3567-2020, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Daria A. Mezentseva
Senior Lecturer of the Chair of Linguistics and Professional Communication, Russian Biotechnological University (11 Volokolamskoe Highway, Moscow 125080, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3330-5289, Researcher ID: IQV-8025-2023, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Abstract
Introduction. The issue of lexical redundancy in academic writing remains crucial. Research based on Russian-language corpora is vital for the development of effective targeted academic writing courses that meet the unique needs of universities. This paper aims to identify factors through examples of wordiness in the Conclusion sections of theses to alter the design of courses broadening academic writing skills to fight against textual redundancy at various educational levels.
Materials and Methods. A corpus of 72 theses across three educational levels (Bachelor’s, Master’s, and Candidate degrees) was analyzed. We selected theses from the repositories of the HSE University and Moscow City University. We focused on Conclusion section due to its highest level of conciseness: textual redundancy critically impacts its effectiveness. The analysis included a comprehensive procedure of raw data extraction, coding, conceptualization during iterative discussions, and classification according to Brohaugh’s taxonomy.
Results. “Invisible” type of wordiness is a prevalent issue in academic writing across all levels of education. Such types as “overkill”, “weak-kneed” and “empty” occur more frequently in research in Master’s and Candidate’s theses. The need to comprehend the reasons behind the use of different types of wordiness and their impact on readability is stressed. Candidate’s theses are wordier despite the expectation of a higher level of academic writing skills at this level.
Discussion and Conclusion. The study highlights the systemic role of academic writing courses at all educational levels in reducing text wordiness. Despite our expectations of advanced writing skills in Candidate’s theses, their high level of wordiness indicates the need for developing effective academic writing strategies. It is crucial to implement a personalized approach to academic writing instruction, considering the specific needs and challenges of each educational level, to create more concise academic texts. The paper provides insights into approaches to designing academic writing courses.

Keywords: wordiness in academic writing, wordiness taxonomy, Brohaugh’s taxonomy, wordiness in thesis Conclusion section, academic writing, academic culture

Conflict of interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

For citation: Tikhonova E.V., Kosycheva M.A., Mezentseva D.A. Ineffective Strategies in Scientific Communication: Textual Wordiness vs. Clarity of Thought in Thesis Conclusion Section. Integration of Education. 2024;28(2):249–265. https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.115.028.202402.249-265

All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Submitted 01.03.2024;
revised 22.04.2024;
accepted 26.04.2024.

Authors’ contribution:
E. V. Tikhonova – conceptualization; methodology; supervision; software; data curation; investigation; visualization; formal analysis; resources; writing – original draft.
M. A. Kosycheva – methodology; software; data curation; investigation; writing – original draft.
D. A. Mezentseva – software; data curation; investigation; writing – original draft.

PlumX

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.