Print

PDF To download article. 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.26303.442-460

UDC 159.937.52:316.6

 

Spatial Reasoning as a Predictor of Mathematical Performance: Evidence from a Gender-Based Analysis

Siti Maryatul Kiptiyah
S.Si., S.Pd., M.Pd., Doctoral Student in Elementary Education, Member of Literacy and Numeracy Center of Excellence, Yogyakarta State University (1 Colombo St., Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4879-9394, Scopus ID: 57216225701, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Yoppy Wahyu Purnomo
M.Pd., Professor of Elementary Teacher Education of the Department of Primary Education, Leader of Literacy and Numeracy Center of Excellence, Yogyakarta State University (1 Colombo St., Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6216-3855, Scopus ID: 56311092100, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Ucu Sumisiani
S.Pd., Student of the Mathematics Education Study Program, Muhammadiyah University of Prof. Dr. Hamka (2 Limau St., Jakarta, Indonesia), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1717-7496, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Gunawan
M.Pd., Member of Literacy and Numeracy Center of Excellence, Yogyakarta State University (1 Colombo St., Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia), Lecturer of Mathematics Education Study Program, State Islamic University of Salatiga (KM. 2 Lingkar Selatan St., Salatiga 50714, Indonesia), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0324-4160, Scopus ID: 58579420600, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Abstract
Introduction. Spatial reasoning is a critical cognitive factor supporting visualization, diagram interpretation, and mathematical problem-solving. However, its predictive contribution and gender-related patterns remain insufficiently understood among secondary school students. This study aims to examine the predictive relationship between spatial reasoning and mathematical performance and to investigate gender differences across both variables.
Materials and Methods. A cross sectional survey design was employed involving 437 students selected from a population of 789 students at a public school in Jakarta. The study utilized two validated instruments: a spatial reasoning test and a mathematical performance test. Data analysis included simple linear regression to determine the extent to which spatial reasoning predicts mathematical performance, and an independent-samples t-test to analyze gender differences in both domains.
Results. Spatial reasoning significantly predicted mathematical performance, indicating that students with stronger spatial reasoning tended to demonstrate better mathematical performance. A statistically significant gender difference was found in spatial reasoning, with male students obtaining higher scores than female students. In contrast, no statistically significant gender difference was found in mathematical performance. Overall, the findings show that spatial reasoning was significantly associated with mathematical performance, whereas gender differences were observed in spatial reasoning but not in mathematical performance.
Conclusion. The findings indicate that spatial reasoning is a statistically significant but modest predictor of mathematical performance. The observed gender difference in spatial reasoning, together with the absence of a corresponding difference in mathematical performance, suggests that spatial reasoning should be supported through equitable instructional opportunities rather than interpreted as a fixed gender-related attribute.

Keywords: spatial reasoning, mathematical performance, gender differences, predictive analysis, spatial visualization, secondary school students

Funding: This research was funded by the Indonesian Education Scholarship, administered by the Center for Higher Education Funding and Assessment, and supported by the Indonesian Endowment Fund for Education, Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia.

Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

For citation: Kiptiyah S.M., Purnomo Y.W., Sumisiani U., Gunawan. Spatial Reasoning as a Predictor of Mathematical Performance: Evidence from a Gender-Based Analysis. Integration of Education. 2026;30(3):442–460. https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.26303.442-460

Authors’ contribution:
S. M. Kiptiyah – formulation of research goals and aims; conducting a research and investigation process; application of formal techniques to analyse study data; specifically writing the initial draft.
Y. W. Purnomo – formulation of research goals and aims; development of methodology; oversight and leadership responsibility for the research activity planning and execution; specifically critical review.
U. Sumisiani – application of formal techniques to analyse study data; specifically critical review.
Gunawan – conducting a research and investigation process; verification of the overall reproducibility of results and other research outputs; specifically critical review.

Availability of data and materials. The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the authors on reasonable request.

All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Submitted 07.02.2026;
revised 28.04.2026;
accepted 05.05.2026.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Kaur P., Kumar H., Kaushal S. Technology-Assisted Language Learning Adaptive Systems: A Comprehensive Review. International Journal of Cognitive Computing in Engineering. 2023;4:301–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcce.2023.09.002
  2. Warner S., Kaur A. The Perceptions of Teachers and Students on a 21st Century Mathematics Instructional Model. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education. 2021;12(2):193–215. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/609
  3. Rehman N., Zhang W., Mahmood A., Fareed M.Z., Batool S. Fostering Twenty-First Century Skills among Primary School Students through Math Project-Based Learning. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 2023;10:424. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01914-5
  4. Kliziene I., Paskovske A., Cizauskas G., Augustiniene A., Simonaitiene B., Kubiliunas R. The Impact of Achievements in Mathematics on Cognitive Ability in Primary School. Brain Sciences. 2022;12(6):736. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12060736
  5. Sorby S.A., Panther G.C. Is the Key to Better PISA Math Scores Improving Spatial Skills? Mathematics Education Research Journal. 2020;32:213–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00328-9
  6. Beck M.M., Lind R.R., Geertsen S.S., Ritz C., Lundbye-Jensen J., Wienecke J. Motor-Enriched Learning Activities Can Improve Mathematical Performance in Preadolescent Children. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2016;10:645. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00645
  7. Hobri, Dafik, Hossain A. The Implementation of Learning Together in Improving Students’ Mathematical Performance. International Journal of Instruction. 2018;11(2):483–496. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11233a
  8. Lukowski S.L., DiTrapani J., Jeon M., Wang Z., Schenker V.J., Doran M.M., et al. Multidimensionality in the Measurement of Math-Specific Anxiety and Its Relationship with Mathematical Performance. Learning and Individual Differences. 2019;70:228–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.07.007
  9. Moore A.M., Ashcraft M.H. Children’s Mathematical Performance: Five Cognitive Tasks across Five Grades. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 2015;135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.02.003
  10. Grey S., Morris P. Capturing the Spark: PISA, Twenty-First Century Skills and the Reconstruction of Creativity. Globalisation, Societies and Education. 2024;22(2):156–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2022.2100981
  11. Ocampo E.N., Mobo F.D., Cutillas A.L. Exploring the Relationship between Mathematics Performance and Learning Style among Grade 8 Students. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research. 2023;4(4):1165–1172. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.04.04.14
  12. Bruce C.D., Davis B., Sinclair N., McGarvey L., Hallowell D., Drefs M., et al. Understanding Gaps in Research Networks: Using ‘Spatial Reasoning’ as a Window into the Importance of Networked Educational Research. Educational Studies in Mathematics. 2017;95(2):143–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9743-2
  13. Gilligan K.A., Flouri E., Farran E.K. The Contribution of Spatial Ability to Mathematics Achievement in Middle Childhood. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 2017;163:107–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.04.016
  14. Ottley A., Peck E.M., Harrison L.T., Afergan D., Ziemkiewicz C., Taylor H.A. Improving Bayesian Reasoning: The Effects of Phrasing, Visualization, and Spatial Ability. In: IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics. 2016. p. 529–538. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2015.2467758
  15. Schenck K.E., Nathan M.J. Navigating Spatial Ability for Mathematics Education : A Review and Roadmap. Educational Psychology Review. 2024;36:90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09935-5
  16. Woolcott G., Le Tran T., Mulligan J., Davis B., Mitchelmore M. Towards a Framework for Spatial Reasoning and Primary Mathematics Learning: An Analytical Synthesis of Intervention Studies. Mathematics Education Research Journal. 2022;34:37–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00318-x
  17. Young C.J., Levine S.C., Mix K.S. The Connection between Spatial and Mathematical Ability across Development. Frontiers in Psychology. 2018;9:755. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00755
  18. Hasanah U., Putrawangsa S., Purwanta E., Setiawati F.A., Purnomo Y.W. Primary Student Spatial Reasoning Abilities: Progression and Challenges. Mathematics Education Journal. 2024;18(3):329–348. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.v18i3.pp329-348
  19. Kurt G., Önel F., Çakıoğlu Ö. An Investigation of Middle School Students’ Spatial Reasoning Skills. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education. 2023;16(1):123–141. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2023.319
  20. Jablonski S. Real Objects as a Reason for Mathematical Reasoning – A Comparison of Different Task Settings. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education. 2023;18(4):em0758. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/13859
  21. Medová J., Bulková K.O., Čeretková S. Relations between Generalization, Reasoning, and Combinatorial Thinking in Solving Mathematical Open-Ended Problems within Mathematical Contest. Mathematics. 2020;8(12):2257. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8122257
  22. Lowrie T., Logan T. The Interaction between Spatial Reasoning Constructs and Mathematics Understandings in Elementary Classrooms. In: Mix K.S., Battista M.T. (eds.) Visualizing Mathematics: Research in Mathematics Education. Cham: Springer; 2018. p. 253–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98767-5_12
  23. Fitriyani H., Kusumah Y.S., Turmudi. Spatial Reasoning: A Survey on the 8th Grader Students’ Gain in Online Learning. International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education. 2021;5(1):51–60. https://doi.org/10.12928/ijeme.v5i1.20140
  24. Xu T., Sun S., Kong Q. Spatial Reasoning and Its Contribution to Mathematical Performance across Different Content Domains: Evidence from Chinese Students. Journal of Intelligence. 2025;13(4):41. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence13040041
  25. Mix K.S., Levine S.C., Cheng Y.-L., Young C., Hambrick D.Z., Ping R., Konstantopoulos S. Supplemental Material for Separate but Correlated: The Latent Structure of Space and Mathematics across Development. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2016;145(9):1206–1227. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000182.supp
  26. Lowrie T., Logan T. Spatial Visualization Supports Students’ Math: Mechanisms for Spatial Transfer. Journal of Intelligence. 2023;11(6):127. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11060127
  27. Laski E.V., Casey B.M., Yu Q., Dulaney A., Heyman M., Dearing E. Spatial Skills as a Predictor of First Grade Girls’ Use of Higher Level Arithmetic Strategies. Learning and Individual Differences. 2013;23(1):123–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.08.001
  28. Wai J., Lubinski D., Benbow C.P. Spatial Ability for STEM Domains: Aligning over 50 Years of Cumulative Psychological Knowledge Solidifies Its Importance. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2009;101(4):817–835. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016127
  29. Harris D. Spatial Reasoning in Context: Bridging Cognitive and Educational Perspectives of Spatial-Mathematics Relations. Frontiers in Education. 2023;8:1302099. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1302099
  30. Hasanah I.F., İstiqomah İ., Hasanah U., Budiman H. Connecting with Nature: Tadabur Alam and its Effect on Islamic Value Learning. In: E3S Web of Conferences. 2024;482:04020. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202448204020
  31. Atit K., Power J.R., Pigott T., Lee J., Geer E.A., Uttal D.H., et al. Examining the Relations between Spatial Skills and Mathematical Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 2022;29(3):699–720. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-021-02012-w
  32. Lowrie T., Logan T., Hegarty M. The Influence of Spatial Visualization Training on Students’ Spatial Reasoning and Mathematics Performance. Journal of Cognition and Development. 2019;20(5):729–751. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2019.1653298
  33. Hasanah S.I., Tafrilyanto C.F., Aini Y. Mathematical Reasoning: The Characteristics of Students’ Mathematical Abilities in Problem Solving. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2019;1188:012057. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012057
  34. Harris D., Lowrie T., Logan T., Hegarty M. Spatial Reasoning, Mathematics, and Gender: Do Spatial Constructs Differ in Their Contribution to Performance? British Journal of Educational Psychology. 2021;91(1):409–441. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12371
  35. Dowker A., Sheridan H. Relationships between Mathematics Performance and Attitude to Mathematics: Influences of Gender, Test Anxiety, and Working Memory. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022;13:814992. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.814992
  36. Rodríguez S., Regueiro B., Piñeiro I., Estévez I., Valle A. Gender Differences in Mathematics Motivation: Differential Effects on Performance in Primary Education. Frontiers in Psychology. 2020;10:3050. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03050
  37. Ramful A., Lowrie T., Logan T. Measurement of Spatial Ability: Construction and Validation of the Spatial Reasoning Instrument for Middle School Students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment. 2017;35(7):709–727. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282916659207
  38. Dündar S., Temel H., Gündüz N. Development of a Mathematical Ability Test: A Validity and Reliability Study. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 2016;47(7):1061–1075. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2016.1153734
  39. Purnomo Y.W., Fadhilah F.N., Sumusiasih U., Rahmawati R.D., Fitriya Y. The Role of Spatial Anxiety in the Relationship between Mathematics Anxiety and Spatial Reasoning. Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science. 2024;18(3):229–240. https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2025.180307
  40. Vos H., Marinova M., De Léon S.C., Sasanguie D., Reynvoet B. Gender Differences in Young Adults’ Mathematical Performance : Examining the Contribution of Working Memory, Math Anxiety and Gender-Related Stereotypes. Learning and Individual Differences. 2023;102:102255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102255
  41. Mashuri S., Yawan H. Gender Difference Influence Students’ Performance in Learning Math in Secondary Schools. International Journal of Education, Social Studies, and Management (IJESSM). 2023;3(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.52121/ijessm.v3i1.114
  42. Smetackova I. Gender Stereotypes, Performance and Identification with Math. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015;190:211–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.937

 

PlumX

Лицензия Creative Commons
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Details
Hits: 31