To download article. 

DOI: 10.15507/1991-9468.029.202502.489-506

UDC 17-042.62(470+571)

“What Can Be Bought Must Be Bought...”: Academic Ethics in the Context of “Normal Anomie” of the Russian Society

Marina A. Kashina
Dr.Sci. (Polit.), Associate Professor, Leading Researcher of the Research Laboratory for Strategic Planning and Eurasian Integration, Professor of the Chair of Social Technologies, North-West Institute of Management of RANEPA (57 bld. 41 Srednii Pospekt VO, Saint Petersburg 199004, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4509-8657, Scopus ID: 57205140594, Researcher ID: ABA-7579-2020, SPIN-code: 3108-7931, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Valeria A. Vasilyeva
Cand.Sci. (Sociol.), Senior Lecturer of the Chair of Comparative Political Studies, North-West Institute of Management of RANEPA (57 bld. 41 Srednii Pospekt VO, Saint Petersburg 199004, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8300-5223, Scopus ID: 57211992677, Researcher ID: D-2131-2014, SPIN-code: 4529-7376, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Abstract
Introduction. Despite the impossibility of overestimating the importance of compliance with academic norms in conducting scientific research, there has been an increase in the diversity and number of academic deviations, and violations of academic ethics have become routine and are not perceived by the university community as a serious problem. The attitude of scientists toward violations of academic ethics and the need to comply with them remains insufficiently studied. The purpose of the study is to determine the importance of compliance with academic ethics standards for researchers at universities in the Northwestern Federal District.
Materials and Methods. The study employed a mixed-methods design, combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Data were collected through five focus groups with postgraduate students from Saint Petersburg universities and an expert online survey of 115 university representatives from the Northwestern Federal District of Russia. Focus groups were organized to familiarize participants with the arguments of young researchers regarding the possibilities of academic deviations. An online survey allowed for quantitative assessments of various positions on the research topic, and the use of scales allowed for a quantitative assessment of qualitative characteristics, in particular the relevance of the problem of academic fraud for universities.
Results. The research hypothesis about the presence of high tolerance for violations of academic ethical norms and a decline in trust in the mechanisms for controlling compliance with these norms was confirmed. Postgraduate students adapt to academic anomie, believing that the requirements of academic ethics in writing dissertations in the humanities and social sciences are very difficult to fulfill. Representatives of educational institutions in the Northwestern Federal District of Russia are willing to justify deviations from academic ethical norms in the presence of objective circumstances. External social control over compliance with academic ethics is recognized as ineffective, due to the impunity of scientists with confirmed plagiarism.
Discussion and Conclusion. The results of the conducted research confirm the dominance of rational and pragmatic expediency in the scientific and pedagogical community today. The norms of academic ethics are declared, but not respected, deviant practices become routine, thereby normalized. According to the respondents, external social control over compliance with academic standards is ineffective, which inevitably leads to an increase in violations of academic ethics. The results of the study confirm the dominance of rational-pragmatic expediency in the scientific and pedagogical community today.

Keywords: postgraduate studies, higher education, social institute of science, academic deviations, plagiarism, scientific community

Funding: The article was prepared as part of the research work within the state assignment of RANEPA.

Acknowledgments: The authors would like to thank Professor L. A. Vasilenko (RANEPA) for his constructive criticism of the article’s concept, the anonymous reviewers for their active work on the article and valuable comments on its improvement, and the journal editorial board for careful attention to the manuscript.

Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

For citation: Kashina M.A., Vasilyeva V.A. “What Can Be Bought Must Be Bought...”: Academic Ethics in the Context of “Normal Anomie” of the Russian Society. Integration of Education. 2025;29(3):489–506. https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.029.202503.489-506

Authors’ contribution:
M. A. Kasnina – formulation of research goals and aims; conducting the research and investigation process; development of methodology; leadership responsibility for the research activity planning and execution; specifically critical review; acquisition of the financial support for the project leading to this publication.
V. A. Vasilyeva – management activities to produce metadata for initial use and later re-use; specifically visualization; specifically writing the initial draft.

Availability of data and materials. The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the authors on reasonable request.

All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Submitted 26.01.2025;
revised 17.03.2025;
accepted 24.03.2025.

REFERENCES

PlumX

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.