Print

PDF To download article. 

DOI: 10.15507/1991-9468.107.026.202202.247-265

 

Interrelation of Neuropsychological and Personality Factors with the Choice of Strategies of Coercion or Nonviolence among Students of the Socionomic Sphere

Vladimir G. Maralov
Professor of the Chair of Psychology, Cherepovets State University (5 Prospekt Lunacharskogo, Cherepovets 162600, Russian Federation), Dr.Sci. (Psychol.), Professor, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9627-2304, Scopus ID: 57128513900, Researcher ID: X-5925-2018, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Marina A. Kudaka
Head of the Chair of Psychology, Cherepovets State University (5 Prospekt Lunacharskogo, Cherepovets 162600, Russian Federation), Cand.Sci. (Psychol.), Associate Professor, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0352-390X, Scopus ID: 57204363267, Researcher ID: V-2277-2018, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Olga V. Smirnova
Associate Professor of the Chair of Psychology, Cherepovets State University (5 Prospekt Lunacharskogo, Cherepovets 162600, Russian Federation), Cand.Sci. (Psychol.), Associate Professor, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3659-1626, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Viacheslav A. Sitarov
Professor of the Pedagogy Department, Moscow City University (4-1 2 Selskokhozyaystvennyy Proyezd, Moscow 129226, Russian Federation), Dr.Sci. (Ped.), Professor, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8426-7487, Scopus ID: 6504289657, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Irina I. Koryagina
Associate Professor of the Chair of Humanities, Ivanovo State Medical Academy of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation (8 Sheremetevskiy Prospekt, Ivanovo 153012, Russian Federation), Cand.Sci. (Ped.), Associate Professor, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7821-6819, Scopus ID: 57207467561, Researcher ID: G-9740-2019, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Larisa V. Romanyuk
Professor of the Chair of Pedagogy and Psychology of Higher School, Moscow University for the Humanities (5 Yunosti St., Moscow 111395, Russian Federation), Dr.Sci. (Ped.), Professor, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2764-8205, Scopus ID: 57216297268, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Abstract
Introduction. The urgency of the problem is caused by the importance of formation of ability to non-violent interaction in students of socionomic (helping) sphere as the most important professional competence that assumes study of factors and conditions of its formation and development. The aim of the research is to identify the relationship between neuropsychological and personal factors with the choice of students ‒ future medical, psychological, pedagogical psychologists in the process of interaction strategies of coercion or nonviolence.
Materials and Methods. The study involved students from a number of universities in the Russian Federation: Moscow, Cherepovets, Vologda region, Ivanovo, Ivanovo region. In total – 334 people. As a diagnostic tool, the authorʼs questionnaire was used to identify the positions of interaction among students, the Carver ‒ White questionnaire in the adaptation of G. G. Knyazev, the questionnaire for the diagnosis of five personality factors in the adaptation of L. F. Burlachuk and D. K. Korolev, the scale “Moral normativity” questionnaire “Adaptability” Maklakov – Chermyanin. Mathematical processing was carried out with the help of correlation analysis; Spearman ʼs rank correlation coefficient was also used.
Results. It was established that the choice of coercion strategy by students in the process of interaction is associated with a high level of behavioral activation, low levels of benevolence, conscientiousness and moral normativity. The choice of manipulation strategy, in addition to this, is correlated with high neuroticism. Nonviolence is positively associated with benevolence, conscientiousness, and moral normativity, and negatively to neuroticism. Noninterference correlates negatively with the Behavioral Inhibition System and positively with the Behavioral Inhibition System, as well as with neuroticism, introversion and closeness to experience and low conscientiousness.
Discussion and Conclusion. The obtained results make a certain contribution to understanding of the problem of the relationship between students’ choice in the process of interaction of strategies of coercion or nonviolence with neuropsychological and personal factors, which makes it possible to develop special programs aimed simultaneously at teaching methods of nonviolent interaction, and at the development of certain personal qualities, taking into account individual severity. systems of activation and inhibition of behavior.

Keywords: coercion, manipulation, non-violence, non-interference, behavior activation system, behavior inhibition system, moral normativity, five-factor personality model

Acknowledgments: The authors would like to thank the editorial board and reviewers for their attentive attitude to the article and the indicated comments, which have made it possible to improve its quality.

Conflict of interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

For citation: Maralov V.G., Kudaka M.A., Smirnova O.V., Sitarov V.A., Koryagina I.I., Romanyuk L.V. Interrelation of Neuropsychological and Personality Factors with the Choice of Strategies of Coercion or Nonviolence among Students of the Socionomic Sphere. Integration of Education. 2022;26(2):247‒265. doi: https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.107.026.202202.247-265

All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Submitted 09.12.2021; approved after reviewing 18.03.2022;
accepted for publication 25.03.2022.

Contribution of the authors:
V. G. Maralov – formulation of the basic concept of research; development of research methodology; selection of diagnostic tools; secondary processing of results; preparation of conclusions and the final version of the article.
M. A. Kudaka – participation in the analysis of literature, collection and primary processing of results on the contingent of students of Cherepovets State University; preparation of the primary version of the article.
O. V. Smirnova – participation in the analysis of literature, collection and primary processing of results on the contingent of students of Cherepovets State University; preparation of the primary version of the article.
V. A. Sitarov – participation in the development of research methodology; collection and primary processing of results on the contingent of students of the Moscow City Pedagogical University; preparation of the final version of the article.
I. I. Koryagina – participation in the analysis of literature, collection and primary processing of results on the contingent of students of the Ivanovo Medical Academy; preparation of the primary version of the article.
L. V. Romanyuk – participation in the analysis of literature, collection and primary processing of results on the contingent of students of the Moscow University for the Humanities; preparation of the final version of the article.

PlumX

Лицензия Creative Commons
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.